What do I do with my unreleased Beatles recording?

14 Responses

  1. Anonymous says:

    A minor correction. The Decca songs that were on Anthology 1 are protected for 70 years. Not 50.

  2. wogew says:

    No, the law was passed this November and doesn't affect previous releases.

  3. Anonymous says:

    I think it does affect previous releases. Because if not it would mean that the "Please Please Me" Album would be public domain by now.
    The cutt-off date is December 31, 1962. Everything released after that is protected for 70 years. That's why "Love Me Do" is now in the public domain and "Please Please Me" is not.

  4. Chris Brown says:

    My understanding is that it does affect previous releases (and that this is one reason the industry hurried the govt into enacting the law now). But nothing that's already public domain will revert so the original 'Love Me Do' stays as it is. I did see some unofficial downloads of the first abum which were presumably calculating the 50 years from the exact release date rather than the year ed, but I believe this is incorrect.

    However, weren't the Decca auditions released by Decca themselves much earlier than 1995? If so they're protected from that original release date not from 1995. And if not why not?

  5. david_b says:

    So, to break it down for me, based on current law, exactly when does McCartney (and Lennon's estate..) get rights to his songs again..?

    Obviously he doesn't want to buy 'em for this reason.

    Thanks much.

  6. Unknown says:

    Read this – This is the official guidance from the UK government

    ipo.gov.uk/directive201177eu.pdf

    As far as i can see from that document The Decca tracks released in 1995 will be covered for 70 years from the date of publishing, it has nothing to do with when they were recorded. If the recordings were issued within 50 years then the copyright date runs from the date of issue.

    The law affects all releases. All recordings released post 1963 are now covered for 70 years.

  7. Anonymous says:

    Richard Moore: "The law affects all releases. All recordings released post 1963 are now covered for 70 years."

    It's everything post 1962. Otherwise "Please Please Me" and "With The Beatles" would be public domain next year.
    The law says: "The extended term applies to all sound recordings that are protected by copyright
    on 1st November 2013."
    Sound recordings that "are protected by copyright
    on 1st November 2013" would have to be released after December 31, 1962.

  8. Foxx says:

    What I understnd from this discussion is that UNRELEASED tapes are protected for 50 years. Publication after 51 years does not help. They will be public Domain and remain so. But: issuing these on (say) cd does involve some remixing etc, if only to get from 4-track to stereo. Can it not be argued that this process creates Something NEW (accident pun) which wil have protection for 70 years after publication?

  9. Unknown says:

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

  10. david_b says:

    Soooo, McCartney has to wait another 20yrs to have the rights returned to him..?

    Obviously this affects some of George's contributions (before Harrisongs..?) and Lennon's estate..?

    Sorry, just trying to see it in plain english.

    Thanks much guys.

  11. Unknown says:

    This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

  12. Michael Desi says:

    I realize this is an old thread, but I have a similar problem. I purchased a collection of reel to reel pre recorded tapes from a music memorabilia auction. and to make a long story short, one of the tapes has three unreleased songs sung by Paul McCartney. I sent a few short audio clips of each song to MPL Communications. Right away I received an email from Eastman and Eastman. They advised me that they will get back to me when their “Team is back from tour. So this is an unmarked 5 inch Reel to Reel tape with no date. How would the copyright be determined? Thanks

    • admin says:

      If you can have a guess what the titles might be, we could try to find if they have been copyrighted. Most likely they probably are, in which case you may own or sell the tape, but not publish the music.

  13. Mike Desi says:

    Im pretty up on Sir Paul McCartney tunes. and none of these sound familiar. I sent the three short (20-30sec) clips to an Auction house in England that specializes in this type of item, and the dealer stated that he estimated it would bring 5 to 10K pounds at auction. It was in a proper 5″ reel to reel box, but not made for this tape. But did have a commercial looking printed label and a hand written “Paul McCartney”. Very interesting that its on a 5″ tape. I think they used the NAGRA reel to reels which were 5″.

Leave a Reply