Star club boot claims to be raw tape

14 Responses

  1. Ted says:

    The list of tracks shown for the 5 CD at the top is totally incorrect.
    Also the fact that this Bootleg firm is claiming that there was 3 tapes involved, which is also untrue.
    All of the tracks from the Beatles were originally on 1 tape, 4 tracks, and recorded at half speed, which gave you a capacity of 8 Hours recording.This can't be the original tape 100%. Plus some of the tracks credited to the Dominoes, we never actually performed. Some of the other Dominoes numbers were actually recorded on a separate 5" spool, but are very poor quality, due to the fact that the Recorder was only set up on a table in the Club with the small microphone supplied with the machine, and were only rehearsal recordings. Their whole claim is preposterous.
    I also point out that I am the undisputed Author of these recordings, and still am to this Day. This claim is a total sham, and a Bootleg of the highest order. Kingsize Taylor.

  2. The Greatest Online Business in the World ( probably ) says:

    Great to have these things nice & clear from somebody who was actually there at the time, so people like myself dont get stitched up like kipper……….
    once again thanks Ted Regards Nick

  3. wogew says:

    Well Ted, these may not be from your original, but the 1973 reference make it plausible that they are the tapes made by Chappel Studios. Allan Williams took your tape there to get it transferred to professional reels in 1973.

  4. Ted says:

    Hi Roger.October 31. 1973, both Allan and myself went to negotiate a deal with the Beatles, to which they agreed in principle, but they would not give their full consent until George had heard the recordings, and asked for a copy to send to him. The copy that we made at Chappel Studios was a copy of the tape that I gave to Eppy, and not the Original, which was 8 hours long. I still have the Original receipt from Apple which states this quite clearly.

  5. Unknown says:

    Ted, Allan Williams once said that the original tape was subsequently cut up. Can you shed any light on this?

  6. Anonymous says:

    Hi Ted,

    Not to pile it on, but you do hold the key to a number of questions many Beatle collectors have wondered for many years. Would you consider doing a Q&A about the tapes, either here or somewhere else on the net? It would be greatly appreciated!

    I guess the two questions probably most folks would wonder about are:

    1) As the previous commenter asked, was the original tape cut up?

    2) Do you still have the original 8-hour tape, cut up or otherwise?

    Thanks and glad to hear there's still someone out there who knows the truth!

  7. Ted says:

    My reply to Colin and Albert.
    The Original tape had been just thrown into a cardboard junk box in "Studio One" Records, Hackin Hey Liverpool after Eppy gave his ridiculous offer of 20 Pounds, just for my trouble.When John Seddon, who was the owner, and good friend of mine closed his Company down, everything in his office was just thrown into the cellar below.These buildings were Old Warehouses, and very prone to being damp Dungeons,very like The Cavern Club, and in the same area.
    I will add, that in 1966 I got out of the Music business completely, and went back to my old trade as a Butcher,the tape was then, totally incidental to me. Then in 1972, at a Mersey-Beat Revival Show, I happened to mention to Allan Williams about the Tape, then the story started off there AGAIN!
    Allan, John Seddon and I went to the old office to see if we could gain access to the building, but it was all locked, and boarded up, but luckily enough The Members of "The Scaffold" had opened a Boutique call "Thru the Looking Glass" just across the Street, and I knew Roger very well, so off we go. Roger told us that there was a Watchman who used to make regular checks on these now derelict buildings, and he had his telephone number, and would give him a bell, This he did. One Hour later the guy turned up and unlocked the door for us.The place stank of rotting sewage, mildew and damp air. We went down in the cellar, were there was heaps of papers and boxes, just lying around covered with mould, the whole place was a health hazard, and I was just for getting out of there, and balls to the tape! Allan's greed got the better of him and carried on searching, then I spotted the box and asked Allan to pass it over, and there it was, the tape. Then we did the most stupid thing without even thinking about it, we took it home and played it on my machine to check it. The tape being damp,started to shed the magnetic side, and was clogging up the head on the machine, then we tried to fast forward it to various places, which caused the tape to snap and bundle up in the head. My solution was to leg the tape dry out totally before we did any more damage. So in the end the only possible solution was to get the once only chance of baking the tape, and lift off the sound before it fell totally apart.This was not done by us, but by a professional Sound Technician.
    ANSWERS: The tape was never cut up. AND: No I haven't got it. It died of inevitable natural causes.

  8. Anonymous says:

    I've been offline for a couple of days, so I haven't checked this thread. Wow, Ted! What an amazing story! That explains a lot about why they were cut up the way they were once released. Too bad about the original tape, but at least it was salvageable to some degree!

    One quick follow-up that I probably already know the answer to, considering this new information: As you've said, the Beatles, your band the Dominoes, and the Rebel Rousers were on *this* tape. Was this December 1962 time frame the only time you ever made recordings like this? Did you ever record other bands in Hamburg or Liverpool at that time? And if so, do any of those tapes still exist?

    It's such an interesting time in musical history and I feel that most of the great bands on the Liverpool scene in the early 60s weren't done justice once they made a proper record, if they ever got to make a proper record at all.

    Thanks again for your response!

  9. wogew says:

    Ted is currently in hospital, undergoing surgery. He will not be able to comment for a while.

  10. Mary says:

    Misterclaudel's press release in Japan says IT IS the 1973 raw tapes, adding "just check the track list and you will notice materials never out before". Also, it CLEARLY says it's the 1973 transfer and NEVER says it comes from 3 different tapes (like Ted said), it says 4 different reels of the SAME tape. Meaning, the guy who made this transfer (with Ted’s tapes) put it in different reels due of his length. Maybe Ted just wanted to STOP us, the collectors, buying it because it DOES contains unbootlegged stuff, plus, this will, of course, affect the auction in coming days. This boot will be out very soon so we can check for ourselves.

  11. Ted says:

    I really must say that I find it totally ironic that people are willing to accept a well chewed old bone again, and are willing to turn a blind eye to the real facts regarding my recordings. For 24 Years and more, the Beatles fought for their rights to suppress these recordings with a 20,000,000 Pound Fund, why, nobody knows to this Day. But then, themselves, seem quite happy to use various tracks for there own convenience. Obviously this they are still condoning, according to the claims of this Bootleg Company. This has been the Worlds biggest Bootleg ever, but the only person that they ever took Legal proceedings against was myself, which I find most odd!! Somewhere out there in the World, is a minimum amount of 130,000,000 Pounds of UN-PAID Royalties, so where is that?
    All of these Court Cases, and Judgements were based on lies, and nothing else. And that being the case, The Law is an Ass.

  12. Victor says:

    youtube.com/watch?v=KPfjcIWzTRg#t=64

    Sounds amazing!

  13. Unknown says:

    The jury is in. MC lied through his teeth. Nothing to see here folks, move along.

  14. Anonymous says:

    Our former bass player said that Taylor offred him the tapes for $250.
    goo.gl/YDbejA

Leave a Reply