Beatles vinyl remasters – first photo

6 Responses

  1. Stephane says:

    If the content is really reproducing the covers, inner sheets and labels as the originals were at first, it's okay for me; I buy it… I don't need a presentation copying the 2009 stereo cd remasters.
    For the original analog masters, I still have my vinyls made in the '70s.

    P.S.: Always a pleasure to follow your blog.

  2. shekespeare says:

    Hey Roger you have right with the date of released on November 13th. I preordened my Box Set on from Amazon USA thanks to you and to your blog. Thanks man!

  3. Stephane says:

    Me too! 345€ on French Amazon for whom interested…

  4. James19 says:

    I just pre-ordered it, so pumped!

  5. Popper says:

    These LPs are from the digital remasters, right? Can anyone explain why? Transfering from Analogue source tapes to digital cannot add any fidelity – it can only alter or degrade it. So what is the sense in mastering vinyl from a 2nd (at least) generation digital source? Surely they'd be better going back straight to the analogue masters and using them?

    I am sure this will cause complaints.

  6. Van Minde says:

    At what bitrate are the actual 2009 digital remasters (as opposed to the CDs themselves which came out in 2009, which are definitely 16-bit/44.1-kHz)? A friend has a "rip" of a 24-bit/44.1-kHz, 3-DVD set whose artwork says "Made in Japan"… PLEASE tell me they remastered those albums AT LEAST as high as 24-bit/96-kHz. Otherwise, the LPs are for show only.

Leave a Reply to StephaneCancel reply