New Apple boss

26 Responses

  1. William Campbell says:

    “…commercialization, and audience growth…”

    i.e. Sink The Beatles to the lowest common denominator, which is pretty low in the current music industry.

    That sure doesn’t sound good. It’s just another business deal to him.

    He wants The Beatles to go find new fans, when it should be the other way around.

    No mention of long time fans.

  2. The last sentence in your article…..says it all…

  3. “That’s not what the most ardent Beatles fans are looking forward to, as we are more interested in the real deal, not actors posing as The Beatles.”
    Great statement.

  4. Krist Delgado says:

    Please continue with the remixed reissues of the classic albums, this time with Blu-Ray Dolby Atmos mix included!

    • Tim Wilson says:

      And please re-mix using the Yellow Submarine Songtrack method which yielded way superior sound quality and dynamic range than the MAL lazy way mixes.

      • Glenn Milam says:

        Most of the pre Sgt Pepper’s stuff is only four tracks. There’s not a lot of remixing possible with that.

  5. Andrew H says:

    Definitely continue with the remixes – and pay attention to the primary demographic – they buy physical media (this isn’t just a generational thing; people purchasing ‘deluxe editions’ at any age aren’t looking for a streaming option as their go to choice. Online threads (everywhere) made it very apparent that the deluxe Revolver lost a lot of potential sales by dropping what, for many, is the key appeal – those HQ audio (not low res streaming) surround mixes on disc).

  6. Kevin says:

    I stand with other commentators above — bio-pics are no better than “tribute” bands. The originals continue to be badly served when so many LPs and songs remain untouched by a careful remixing (let’s not forget Magical Mystery Tour, much of this has yet to be improved on since 2009 and the New Blue version of “Walrus” is an abomination), Shea and Let it Be are still MIA, and so much more.

    And put Mark Lewisohn on payroll so he can work fulltime to finish his books!

  7. Rob Geurtsen says:

    Superb reporting!

  8. Vox Starstream says:

    Here’s to hoping they sack Giles Martin and bring Ron Furmanek back!

  9. Paul Murphy says:

    While Neil may have indeed had the onset of the cancer that would shortly claim him, it was not the reason he departed Apple, he was fired. To quote Mark Lewisohn: “Neil was sacked, and he was angry about it.” Doubtless Apple’s owners were angry too, that he failed to nail down the 1991 Apple Computers case in enough detail that they did not lose a fortune in legal fees on the 2003-2006 battle. It should also be noted that Paul, again according to Lewisohn, paid for Neil’s New York medical treatment, and that won’t have come cheap.

    I’m also not too convinced that Neil ‘supervised’ the “Rock N’ Roll” and “Love Songs” compilations, given that all 4 Fabs disliked-to-loathed the artwork on the former, and the issues with the mixes. Post-1976, EMI could, and did, do whatever they liked with The Beatles’ material, up to the late 80’s clear-the-decks settlement that led to us getting some pretty amazing releases since.

    What the new chap will bring to the table will be interesting to see. For all the comments about ‘cash’ and ‘money-motivated’, someone needs to do something with the material and the maximising of it. The last posted profit I read for Apple, 2019, was just over 4 million pounds, so, a million to each Fab. After tax – much less than a million. Circa what the Gallagher’s earned for last night’s concert.

    And there is no chance that Mark Lewisohn is going to be coming back onside at Apple. Leaving aside Olivia’s inherited veto of him, didn’t he write them a letter a while back, because they [the company] were actively blocking him from sources? Either way, he is already ‘on’ someone’s books, his publishers. Who must be so pleased to have paid over a million pounds and after 25 years have got… as far as ‘Love Me Do.

    • Tim Wilson says:

      Whatever they do, that although there are younger Beatle fans joining us all the time, the true core buying public that want more depth in what is being released from Apple are well along in their late 60 and 70s and the time to move ahead supported by better technological treatment of archived film/video/music is NOW.

    • Stephen says:

      Never heard of Neil being sacked before! Do you have any more on that quote of Lewisohn’s, or any more context? Intrigued…

      • Paul Murphy says:

        Hi Stephen, it’s from an interview that Mark did with a Beatles podcast a couple of years ago before he went into recluse mode, where Mark was saying how he had envisaged his talks with Neil to go “something like ‘Tuesdays With Morry'” [I’m sure I’ve spelt that wrong], but he only had the one 3-hour interview and then “I left it becuase Neil didn’t talk to ANYONE and I knew he was uncomfortable … and then Neil became ill.” Mark stated he got the call from Neil because “He was sacked [from Apple] and he was angry.” In the same interview Mark disclosed that Paul paid for Neil’s New York medical bills, whether that was out of kindndess or as payment for a NDA was not disclosed.

        I would imagine that, apart from all our own and his family’s sorrow, that must have come as a real kick in the teeth to Mark’s publishers, given that, multiple interviews with Paul aside, and his recent interviews with Patti, Mark has had little access to any of the real mother-lode for his book[s?] – no John, no Ringo [“he said one word to me once”], 2 brief interviews with George before the quiet one became the stoney-silence one, no Yoko [she had Mark removed from John’s “Anthology” after George’s unkind and extremely untre accusations against him], no Cilla, no Jane Asher [she turned him down, as she does everyone], no Mal, only one attributed direct quote from Cynthia to him in “Tune In”, no direct quotes attributed from Pete Best to him, no Maureen, Ringo’s ex-fiance Gerry turned him down, and then – no Neil either. That leaves Brian’s files as the only real exclusive for certain (so far as I am aware, Mark has never admitted to interviewing Allen Klein, or Phil Spector, although maybe he has and doesn’t want to naff Paul off). And I doubt if he has been able to interview Bob Dylan either, which really naffs ME off because my own research is still coming up short on the song Bob and John wrote and recorded together (‘Norwegian Wood’ seems the obvious candidate, given that with ‘Fourth Time Around’ they are the same tune and subject matter, but if John really did write in on holiday with George Martin, the dates do not match. Also, the song is patently about an assignation in Norwood, London, hence the title).

        Anyone wanting a fresh take on The Fabs, by the way, my satire ‘The Fabbles – Across The Soloverse’ is now out in paperback on Amazon [ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 979-8289316134]. Shame not pictured!

        • Blakey says:

          Well, they are known for sacking people. Ask Pete Best, Geoff Baker. But sacking Neil? When he was ill? Even they are not that dirty, surely? I wonder though, if Brian Epstein had lived, would he also have got the push?

          • Paul Murphy says:

            Well, you have to remember, it was not known that Neil was ill when he was sacked. Even by Neil himself (otherwise he would have said to Mark L “ask me everything NOW”). It was one of those ufortunate cases where the disease went from nothing to everything in a short space of time, the same with Terry Hall for instance. And business is business, and that lost case against Apple Computers, when it should have been wrapped skintight in the 1991 agreement, that cost Apple [Fabs] an absolute fortune in legal fees. Three years of top-dollar lawyers fees – it probably put the Klein settlement in the shade.

            Maharishi would indeed have been a good interview, Mark didn’t get him, also his negotiations with Magic [cough] Alex fell through. Mark does know someone who did get to interview Alex, who told him “You won’t believe some of the stuff he [Alex] is saying”, so some of that 3rd hand stuff might come out. But it’s all a moot point – who will live to see it! 12 years now to tell the lives of 4 people over 4 years, alllowing for 6 hours sleep a night, that means the book will take longer to write than the 4 Fabs’ every waking moment in real time. Oh, Mark also missed Jimmy Nicholl as well, because he couldn’t find anywhere to park when he suddenly saw him [JL] crossing the road somewhere. And no Ed Sullivan either. It’s OK for Mark to say “Well, I’ve got the existing interviews” – i.e. other people’s research – but that’s only helpful if they were telling the truth in the first place. All this nonsense about Ed booking the Beatles because he say scenes of fans at the airport, it’s garbage, the deal was already signed by then. And for Mark to discount John’s heroin addiction, when EVERYONE who witnessed it firsthand, 3 other Beatles included, have gone on record as to how serious it was – that’s bad pool. We’ll know when the books come out, if nothing else we’ll apparently find out why Bob Wooler ended up as a bingo caller – that’s the stuff we’ve been drooling to hear!

        • Blakey says:

          And, wouldn’t the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi have been an interesting interview? Same with Brian Jones and his take on ‘You Know My Name’. A shame that they are both no longer with us.

  10. Colin Bell says:

    From a relative half baked idea into a company that was so chaotic, so full of hangers on, bleeding money faster than it was going in that it was doomed to failure from the moment of its birth. But it has survived and is still in business, albeit run differently and not quite the utopian vision that started the ball rolling and more corporative than they initially wished for, but its still in business, and taking into account the almost reckless conception it began with, that is a remarkable feat .

  11. Blakey says:

    Beatles fans have been lucky/blessed. Especially the 2017 to 2022 deluxe reissues under Jeff Jones. Stones fans (first generation fans) get nothing. Everything unreleased from the 60s will stay unreleased. If – or when – it ever comes out, all 60s era Stones fans will be dead.

    Apple? Hope we get a Rubber Soul SDE box set and a deluxe set covering the psychedelic era (Magical Mystery Tour/Yellow Submarine). But I suspect this bloke wants the Fabs to appeal to Gen-Z types. Those daft films for a start. Why four different films about each of them and not one about all of them? They ‘promised’ to release the Let It Be film, but it appeared on Disney Plus and was never released physically. Even Peter Jackson’s Get Back never got a Region 2 release. And the Red and Blue albums remixed just to plug Now and Then? The Blue was an atrocity. I Am The Walrus and Old Brown Shoe were destroyed. Apple has been flawed for some time (no decent quality release since Revolver in 2022). But now will it get better or worse?

    • Paul Murphy says:

      The main reason ‘Now And Then’ appeared on “Blue” [they will need to ditch the “62-66” and “67-70” soubriquets now], apart from the delay updating “Anthology”, is fiscal. It had to appear somewhere, and, as it is the most financially rewarding song copyright to The Beatles – i.e. it is a demo and was written by an artist outside of any record or publishing contract and with all 4 names on the final version so they own it outright – placing it on one of the Beatles’ best-selling albums made sound financial sense, if not artistic sense. A shame Neil Innes has gone – a re-released Ruttles with new song ‘Maybe And Perhaps’, found on a wax cylinder in Nasty’s outside lavatory, would have been a nice finale to them as well.

  12. Blakey says:

    I reckon Apple will still be sanitised. The 2009 remasters sleeve notes had no mention of drugs, Yoko, Klein, infighting or anything negative. And Mark struggling with Tune In will suit Apple down to the ground. They won’t want anything nasty or rotten any of the Fabs got up to put out there. Because the Beatles name is now a money hoovering corporate brand like Disney or McDonald’s. Part of the reason we all loved them was they were very human. Especially John, who was honest about his good and bad points. What would John think about his band as a merch machine ‘competing’ with Taylor Swift and appealing to the the Ed Sheeran generation? These new films may also be a cause for concern. Will each Beatle be whitewashed? Will their personalities (faults and all) be removed for these biopics? All in the name of the ‘brand’…

    • Paul Murphy says:

      Ringo has been working with Sam Mendes on his own biopic, he spent 2 days with him recently, although he says he changed little or nothing in the script.

  13. Brian from Canada says:

    Neil held the position pre-1970 too: he was its first temporary head until Klein got hired. Then he took it over when Klein was ousted. However, in 1975, the company went effectively defunct, shutting down all of its divisions and only getting involved in lawsuits to protect The Beatles’ image.

    This is why EMI didn’t turn to Neil for anything on the compilations from Rock And Roll Music to 20 Greatest Hits: it went to George Martin instead, because Martin was their contact in the music business.

    Apple took a bigger role after the question of royalties in the early 80s (the same questions that led to the revelation of what Paul did in 1975 with his contract renewal). Apple then took a bigger role with the SECOND pressings of the CDs, since they started to carry the logo once Apple decided to step in and order EMI not to make 1962-1966/1967-1970 a boxed set in 1989.

    Neil’s firing is connectable to two things: first, they and EMI were holding out for higher royalties on digital sales – something which broke when McCartney, switching to HearMusic as his distributor, left a limited time for EMI to profit from digital sales of a Beatles’ catalogue. Second, the battle with Apple Computers ended up failing, and The Beatles were likely assured that they’d win given they “won” the first time and this was to be an extension of that.

    Did Neil even show up at the premiere of Love? That might tell you something was up.

Leave a Reply to Vox StarstreamCancel reply