One to one concerts scheduled for documentary

16 Responses

  1. Rob Marshall says:

    “Two” of history’s most influential and iconic artists? I’d agree to one!

  2. mike says:

    Can’t stop scraping the barrel, jeez. Well, Geraldo must be happy, he loves getting attention.

  3. P Davies says:

    We’re talking one iconic artist and a leach who attached herself to him. Calling this deluded woman iconic is ludicrous.

    • Danny Jones says:

      you’re entitled to your opinion, but Yoko Ono was already a highly respected and well know person in the art world before she met John. He learned so much from her and without her we wouldn’t so much of his iconic work – including his most famous song Imagine. She is an icon for so many people but especially a lot of females, not for being a leach, but for being a strong independent and hugely influential artist in her own right. Absolutely not without her faults – same as John – but i would say she has as much right to be described as iconic. Again, that doesnt mean people have to like or enjoy her work, but i feel like whenever she starts to get the credit she deserves she immediately and unfairly gets jumped on and accused of being something in a derogatory way. And i wanted to try and balance this out. Peace & Love.

      • Tim Wilson says:

        How would any of us like having their significant other pilloried publicly? It happened with Linda also. How can any one of us expect any person around any of the individual Beatles to have the talent our heroes had or garner our affection for them? Paul/Linda and John/Yoko. It was about being close to your spouse and being a sounding board and contributor of ideas. I can’t criticize it…

      • Tumble Starker says:

        She was well known in the art world as being a pest, highly respected, not a chance, If she hadn’t met John, no one would have remembered her, don’t forget she tried to snare Paul first and when this failed she bombarded John, I disagree with her being an icon, name me something non-john related that she has created that is half decent, I will wait, Peas and Spuds! Tumble!

        • Brian from Canada says:

          Before meeting John, she was a developing visual artist with some reputation for her work. That reputation skyrocketed once she and John connected, leading to performance art like the bag in and the balloons. She had the admiration of those in the art world; whether she had it from others is something else.

          Where Yoko becomes more controversial is that she wavered between her own work and works which she makes a strong connection to John and his legacy. The latter seem leech-like; the former connect to those early days of interactive performance sculpture. Quite frankly, making a rest area of tress coming out of coffins is a very stunning piece to experience (or, at least, it was for me).

          But – in context of the time these concerts happened – there was no mistaking the influence of Yoko on the art world, joined by John. Her music was far more experimental than conventional. She was a very public figure who promoted positive messaging to the world. To say she wasn’t an icon for some (or that the love story between her and John wasn’t iconic for rock and roll) misses a key point.

          We may not like her singing or her works, but she did earn her reputation, that’s for sure.

        • Danny Jones says:

          hiya – i wouldn’t want to get in to a back and forth about the merits of her work, art is almost always subjective. You can see an over view of her career – pre lennon – on wikipedia, inc an exhibition of her work that was deemed interesting enough for Lennon to visit – and eventually meet Yoko at.

      • Win Corr says:

        Obviously. Yoko was not as famous as John. Who is? But Yoko was a full blown artist traveling in the circle of the greats of all time. Period. She was in the Fluxus Group and was championed by John Cage who she did events with, Marcel Duchamp and Peggy Guggenheim.. and doing multimedia conceptual art way back then. Now all the other baggage about breaking up the Beatles, her personality etc…Does not change that fact.

  4. Francis Chmielewski says:

    I don’t understand why it takes 50 + years for this and Let It Be to be finally released. I mean after all that time half of the audience is probably dead and others are too old to even care. The next generation couldn’t care less about it. But it seems like it’s a last minute effort to score some fast cash. I’m a big fan, but the show wasn’t that good. I have a very decent copy from Japan. John was great but the rest of the band was mediocre at best. BTW John was the only iconic one on that stage!

    • Win Corr says:

      That’s cockeyed. I think you would be surprised. Are you paying attention to the right things at all? At least when it comes to this.

  5. Glenn Milam says:

    The original releases were a bit of a let down, so I don’t have a lot of hope for a new version that includes the outtakes.

  6. Tumble Starker says:

    Average show, have the cassette copy and VHS copy of the gig, I never play either, and as someone points out, probably just another way of making money. Will watch out of interest!

  7. Juan Antonio says:

    Que hartazgo de Yoko…

  8. Philip says:

    I attended the evening show at Madison Square Garden on August 30, 1972. It was one on the loudest convents I have ever attended. It was raw rock n roll !

  9. Roger James says:

    The last few Lennon docs have been pretty good. May Pang’s story was fantastic. The One to One concert story is an interesting one. I wonder how much Geraldo Rivera is in the flick. As a life long Beatles fan I would rather see a good documentary than a fictional movie.

Leave a Reply