There’s a leak

5 Responses

  1. Macfamily says:

    Hello,

    I love your blog and read it every day or two. I consider it my best source for Beatles news and thank you for all of your effort. You mentioned that we now know that Paul's voice is tampered with. Can you point us to that article or elaborate? I am sure they auto-tune him, but does he touch up in the studio as well?

    I was looking forward to this disk because I have felt that Paul have never released a good sounding live disc. And the chatter is a bit to "cute" for his age 🙂 When I heard that the guy in charge of the remasters was mixing the disc I was very hopeful

    Thank you again.
    L.

  2. wogew says:

    Hi, and thank you for following my blog. The use of auto-tune or other studio-based enhancements on Paul McCartney's voice has not, as far as I know, been referenced by McCartney himself or people around him. It has only been pointed out by fans who have been hearing this record. I'm sure it will be elaborated on when the record gets it's reviews by professional music reviewers. That laid aside, I think this is a good live recording, although I felt that the stereo image was very narrow. This may be just the version I downloaded, though. Another thing is that whenever I'm at a McCartney concert I have always thought that he sounds better live than on subsequent live recordings. But on this one, he also sounds great on record.

  3. Stephane says:

    Hi!
    Best exemple…I've got a feeling at 0:17…the second "Oh yeah"…we hear it clearly the auto-tune…
    All the best!
    Stephane

    P.s. Great as always! Keep the good work!

  4. Anonymous says:

    Other people are suggesting that's not Autotune — that it sounds, rather, like overdubbing. I'm not sure why it should matter if it's one or the other. Those of us who went to one of these shows know how great he sounded. Plus, you'd expect that in a recording of a live performance, certain things would have to be fixed, wouldn't you? He's got to sing a wrong note here and there.

  5. Macfamily says:

    Anonymous said…

    "Those of us who went to one of these shows know how great he sounded. Plus, you'd expect that in a recording of a live performance, certain things would have to be fixed, wouldn't you? He's got to sing a wrong note here and there."

    I actually prefer live recordings to be untouched, you can pick them up the day of or the day after Barenaked Ladies and Crowded House shows (to name just two). But if Paul put out a disc like that, the press would be all over him. It is one thing to see a show with a very loud crowd of people and area acoustics; it is another matter to hear it with headphones on.

    It is expected and the industry norm to use pitch correction, I do remember how ticked off I was when I found out the Eagles first Live album was "touched-up" to the extent that it was, I have a copy of the show before they touched it up, they went overboard . IMHO. It really became a studio album 🙂

    But hey, I wish I could sing half as well as Paul and lets not forget his age. I also really like his Chaos and Creation voice.

    I was able to get a copy of the CD before the release and this is my opinion, it is his best live recording for many reasons, pitch correction and all.

    L

Leave a Reply